Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to braintank.ch

Braintank alternatives & similar sites

Braintank – Thoughts – Ideas – Action — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Management Consulting Industry →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
pro-action.ch 64 match
2 shared topics
Home - Pro Action Switzerland de management-consulting-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
aka-excellence.de 64 match
2 shared topics
Andreas Katzer – Aka – Excellence Germany de management-consulting-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
juergensen-consulting.de 64 match
2 shared topics
Gunnar Jürgensen – Ideenfinder – Entscheidungshelfer – Konfliktlöser Germany de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
jsehrig.de 64 match
2 shared topics
Prof. Dr. Jürgen Sehrig – Supervision – Training – Organisationsentwicklung Germany de management-consulting-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
bruhin-cfo.ch 64 match
2 shared topics
Christoph Bruhin – Interim & Fractional Leadership Switzerland de executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
authentizitaet.net 64 match
2 shared topics
Topauthent Dorothee Schank – Home de management-consulting-industryJoomla robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
adp-methode.de 64 match
2 shared topics
Topauthent Dorothee Schank – Home Germany de management-consulting-industryJoomla robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
antral.de 63 match
2 shared topics
antral° – The Better New Germany de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
q-monk.com 63 match
2 shared topics
QMONK – Dr. Olaf A. Thelen – Quality Business Management de management-consulting-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
st-management-solutions.ch 63 match
2 shared topics
st management solutions – by Sabine & Thomas Switzerland de management-consulting-industryWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
jn-schmidt.de 63 match
2 shared topics
Janine Nonny Schmidt – Beratung, Coaching, Training – Wiesbaden Germany de management-consulting-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
achimklatt.de 63 match
2 shared topics
Achim Klatt – Trainer und Organisationsberater Germany de management-consulting-industryWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
agenturfuerdasundenkbare.de 63 match
2 shared topics
Ramona Swhajor – Innovationsberatung Germany de management-consulting-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
aljarenk.de 63 match
2 shared topics
RENK – Stärke entwickeln – Alja Renk – Speaker, Trainer, Moderator, Coach, Berater für Entwicklung in Führung und Zusammenarbeit Germany de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
provokativ-coaching.com 63 match
2 shared topics
Marco | DIE WERTSCHÄTZER | Coaching – Beratung & Begleitung – Training de management-consulting-industryDrupal robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
additde.de 63 match
2 shared topics
ADDIT Deutschland AG – Digitale Strategien – Geschäftsprozesse – Interim Management Germany de management-consulting-industryWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
kaiserconsult.de 63 match
2 shared topics
KaiserConsult – Training & Coaching Germany de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
new-liberation.com 63 match
2 shared topics
Home – New Liberation de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.