Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bradmortensen.com

Brad Mortensen · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
adadev.net
ADADEV - Home
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
arunayyarsamy.com
Arun Ayyarsamy | Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
anishchanda.dev
Anish Chanda
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
piatorain.com
Pia Torain
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
mattiabeccari.com
Mattia Beccari
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
matthiaslexer.com
Matthis Lexer - Software Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
ronaldo.dev
Ronaldo Ramos Junior – Software Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
nickgowdy.com
Personal website of Nick Gowdy - Software Engineer
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
animeshbhatt.com
Animesh Bhatt - Software Developer & SaaS Founder
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
abdelhamide.dev
Abdelhamid's website
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
aadilahsan.tech
Aadil Ahsan | Software Engineer
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
artemgolubev.com
Artem's Blog – On software and more…
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
dogukankorkmaz.com
Dogukan | Mobile Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
kwhitejr.com
Kevin White
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
piperdaniel.com
Daniel Piper - Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
nextbitestudio.com
NextBite Studio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
mattgeimer.com
Matt Geimer
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
benbeck.dev
Ben Beck - Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.