Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bradleyaustin.dev

Bradley Austin | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
83match
biplavbarua.dev
Biplav Barua | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
kwonjustin.com
Justin Kwon | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
rlchandani.com
Rohit Chandani | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
arthursena.com
sena | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
adamgrady.dev
Adam Grady | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
faridraka.dev
Farid Raka | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
matiasrotondo.com
John Doe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
dnuge.dev
Daniel Nugent | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
sonangga.dev
Angga Maulana | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
rjcodes.dev
Lee Ren Jie | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
sokuranton.dev
Anton Sokur - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
nguyennd.com
Duy Nguyen | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
adilraqioui.tech
Adil Raqioui — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
dnhen.com
dnhen | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
aaandrangom.dev
Anthony Andrango | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
andydelgado.dev
Andy Delgado | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
abhisheksharma.me
Abhishek Sharma | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
matthewgoodson.com
Matthew Goodson - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.