Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bradc.dev

Brad Croft - Game Dev Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
gregordev.com
Gregor Roden - Game Dev Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
masq-games.com
Masq - Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
asherhatch.net
Asher Hatch | Asher Hatch - Game Dev Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
7samperry.com
Sam Perry - Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
benedyktcieslinski.com
Game Development Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
farbiesqahshair.com
Indie Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
guillaume-cailhe.com
Guillaume Cailhe - Gamedev portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
kryptekdev.com
Kryptek Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
pimpolidev.com
PimpoliDev Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
thekadex.com
ThekaDex - Game Developer Portfolio Platform
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
kusionowicz.com
Mateusz Kusionowicz - Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
arrakh.com
Arya Rakha || Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
maxrichman.com
Max Richman | Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
boangelov.com
Game Design Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
grusso94.com
Giacomo Russo | Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
pixelrifts.com
Pixel Rifts — Game Development Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
a-sobolev.net
My Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
mateuszfigura.com
Mateusz Figura | Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.