Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to boydjohnson.dev

Boyd Johnson · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
aidanjohnson.dev
Aidan Johnson
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
andrewmarkle.com
Andrew Markle · Andrew Markle
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
armannvg.com
armannvg
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
andreas-herd.com
Andreas Herd
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
rodrigocoincurvo.com
Rodrigo Coin Curvo | Software Developer Educator
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
sorinanton.com
Home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
abenezer.org
Abenezer Belachew / Software Developer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
nevadastart.com
Nevada Start | I’m a software developer and sometimes musician, working mainly with Ruby and Javascript.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
adambarnhard.com
adam barnhard
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
integrisweb.com
Doing It Wrong – learn in public
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andywhittle.dev
Andy Whittle
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
aristeia.com
Scott Meyers: Software Development Consultant
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
thelondoncoder.com
The London Coder
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
roblouie.com
roblouie | Thoughts, ideas, and tutorials on software development. Mostly JavaScript.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewtatham.com
Andrew Tatham
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
bengunson.me
Hi, I'm Bennett
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
djangonl.com
DjangoNL
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
nevezhyn.com
Roman Nevezhyn
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.