Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to borednerdy.com

BoredNerdy · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
codexnerd.com
CodexNerd
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
matanbobi.dev
Matan Borenkraout
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
codeatcafe.com
blackbored. | perfecting the software craft.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
therefactoredhuman.com
The Refactored Human
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
code-nerd.com
Code-Nerd – oh yeah
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
codenerd.com
Join Our Newsletter - CodeNerd
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
billhung.net
Bill Hung - born to be a bear 🐻
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
aeprox.net
Blogging home of Aeprox - The technerdBlogging home of Aeprox | The technerd
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
acepace.net
My website | Musing on random technical subjects
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
aclevername.dev
Jake Klein (aclevername)
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
aclit.org
ACL-IT Website
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
achow101.com
Ava Chow
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
acmwuc.org
ACM-W at UC
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
acrispycookie.dev
ACrispyCookie | Minecraft plugin developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
adalace.org
Adalace | Adalace
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
aks.io
Akshay Srivatsan
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
akselkristoffersen.dev
Aksel Kristoffersen | Oslo, Norway
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
alanschwartzjr.com
Alan Schwartz Jr. | Resume
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.