similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to booksw.app

BookSwap — Kitap Takası Platformu · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

farscakitabevi.com

Home Books - Farsca Kitap Evi

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

2E Kitap - 2E Kitap

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

akarsukitapevi.org

Akarsu Kitapevi

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

KTBKitap - Hayatı Okuyan Kitaplar

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bookletsite.com

Booklet | Kitapseverlerin Günlüğü

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Kahraman Kitapları — Çocuğunuz Hikayenin Yıldızı

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Anasayfa - Matbu Kitap

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Kitap Bahane - Ana sayfa

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Ana Sayfa | 3D Kitaplar

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Online Kitap Satış Sitesi - Matiz Kitap

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Roar Kitap – Yeni Nesil Çocuk Kitapları

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

benimkitabim.net

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ktpkitabevi.com

KTP Kitabevi Online Kitap Alışverişi'nin Yeni Adresi!

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

armonikitabevi.com

Armoni Kitabevi

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

internetkitapcisi.com

İnternet Kitapçısı | Hukuk, Akademik ve Mesleki Kitaplar

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.