Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bookfrans.com

Storygraph Leaderboard · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
theotherjimhargrove.com
The Author Jim Hargrove
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
kristianandtupelo.com
Kristian and Tupelo's Book
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
rooted-readers.com
Rooted Readers
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
dlcrager.com
D. L. - Author, Entrepreneur, and Church Leader
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
robertasilman.com
Roberta Silman - Biography
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
36pages.com
36 Pages | The Story on Picture Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
rizarasco.com
Riza Rasco - Author. Speaker. Leader.
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
ronobooks.com
Noma Reads - Smart Book Picks Curated by Noma Jacks
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
bexarbibliotecharchive.org
BiblioBoard
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
bluesstory.com
Blues Story
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
robertpaladino.com
Robert Paladino — Author & Leadership Scholar
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
thereaders.com
The Readers
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
bigresultsleadership.com
Big Results Leadership - B&H Publishing
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
1streader.com
First Reader
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
doerenee.com
PUBLISHER. LEADER. GRATEFUL MOM. - Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
rondaconger.com
Ronda Conger — Author, Speaker, Leader
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
solmystory.com
Sol My Story
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
arielhbalter.com
Ariel Balter - Biography
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.