Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to bookforum.com

Bookforum · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
64match
leesfee.com
Leesfee
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
63match
cyclebooks.com
Buy Books and Media Products Online - Our Story | [Company Name] | Cycle Books
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
63match
gabywrites.com
Gaby Writes | Children's Book Writer | Gaby Writes
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
63match
bilingual4kidz.com
Bilingual Children's Books on Wildlife Exploration | Book Gallery Links to Amazon | Bilingual4Kidz
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
62match
dailyaudiobook.com
Home
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
61match
katiedaryl.com
Katie Daryl - www.katiedaryl.com
3 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
61match
anetatorchia.com
HOME
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
59match
annadaybooks.com
ANNA WRITES BOOKS - Home
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryfiction
59match
absights.com
ABSIGHTS — Books That Move You | Lagos, Nigeria
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
58match
katherinetiradoryen.com
Home
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
58match
bibliovca.com
Bibliovca – stado tvrdoglavih ljubitelja knjige
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
57match
blackoceanbooks.com
Black Ocean Books – Read to Discover
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.