Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bonsung.me

On the Code · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
codeonthecouch.com
Code on the Couch
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
74match
benc.dev
Pulse Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
codegardener.com
The Code Gardener
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
codegrimoire.com
The Code Grimoire
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
themcglonecode.com
The McGlone Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
codemindinterface.com
The Code-Mind Interface
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
codinginthecrease.com
Coding in the Crease
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
coffeeonthekeyboard.com
Coffee on the Keyboard
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
bhargavpatel.dev
Bhargav Patel – The Code Architect
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
code-bear.com
Does a bear code in the woods?
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
binarcode.net
BINAR CODE
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
codetitan.dev
CodeTitan — The codebase immune system
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
adrianperez.org
Mutant Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
ronankaye.com
Submit Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
codeallthethings.com
Code All The things!
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
thelanguageofcode.com
The Language of Code
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
codebycody.com
Code By Cody
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
hackercodex.com
Hacker Codex
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.