Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to boles.com

David Boles · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
bolesbooks.com
David Boles Books | Writing & Publishing Since 1975
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
dkertesz.com
David Kertesz
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
djkowalski.com
David Kowalski
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
theodandavid.com
Theodan David
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
newstechnica.org.uk 🇬🇧
David Gerard's home page
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
dlcainauthor.com
Home | David L. Cain, Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
theobservingi.com
The Observing I | David Johnson | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
farahsbooks.com
David Farah | Farah's Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
bendablelight.com
Bendable Light - David Rodeback
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
themermaidbookworm.com
The Mermaid Bookworm
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
artificracy.com
Artificracy by David Vivancos
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
artificracia.com
Artificracia by David Vivancos
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
bolenbooks.com
Bolen Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
bookpagesproject.com
David Fokos - The Book Pages project
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
3bearsstudio.com
Rachel Más Davidson
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
dldewey.com
Author/Columnist David Lawrence Dewey's World
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
roccosansone.com
Rebels with a Cause, David Caldwell | Rocco Sansone
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
roddavisauthor.com
Rod Davis
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.