Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to boldhackers.com

Bold Hackers: A Book on Indie Hacking & Software Startups · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
matekudasai.com
Mate Kudasai — Waitlists for Indie Hackers
2 shared topicsstartups
66match
tech-startups.co.uk 🇬🇧
News | Tech Startups
2 shared topicsstartups
65match
addcommitpush.io
addcommitpush.io | Tech, Data, Leadership & Startups
2 shared topicsstartups
64match
dodomrr.com
DodoMRR - Verified Dodo startup revenue database
2 shared topicsstartups
63match
nikhilthadani.com
Nikhil Thadani – Full Stack Developer, iGaming Engineer & Serial Entrepreneur
2 shared topicsstartups
63match
pitechpedia.com
Pitechpedia | The Startup & Innovation Encyclopedia
2 shared topicsstartups
63match
nextleveltech.io
Honest Reviews on Freelance Services & Digital Tools | NextLevel Tech
2 shared topicsstartups
63match
ninodelacruz.com
Home - Nino De La Cruz
2 shared topicsstartups
62match
insistime.com
Vincent Qiao - CTO & Entrepreneur
2 shared topicsstartups
62match
nextbigtool.com
NextBigTool – Where Indie Founders Launch & Buyers Discover
2 shared topicsstartups
62match
blueskystarters.com
Bluesky Starters
2 shared topicsstartups
62match
0toreal.com
0 → Real
2 shared topicsstartups
62match
intrepid.dev
Intrepid: A blog by Dev Ojha
2 shared topicsstartups
62match
mattyhogan.com
Matty Hogan — Serious product builds
2 shared topicsstartups
62match
maxnov.com
Max Novakovic
2 shared topicsstartups
62match
nitypulse.com
Nity Pulse - Innovative Tech Solutions
2 shared topicsstartups
62match
7miles-systems.com
7miles-systems LLC
2 shared topicsstartups
62match
clipsoflogic.com
Clips of Logic
2 shared topicsstartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.