Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to bold-office.com

Paolo Stenech · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
85match
elenahutchinson.com
Elena Hutchinson
3 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
76match
elenaeminger.com
Elena Eminger
3 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
75match
alizehfatima.com
Alizeh Fatima
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
75match
adrianchinquan.com
Adrian Chin Quan
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
75match
adrimontano.com
Adri Montano Portfolio
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
75match
aespellman.com
Angela Spellman
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
73match
mandaludesigns.com
Amanda Lucius
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
73match
diegomartirena.com
Diego Ivan Martirena
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
68match
hayaalsharif.com
Haya Sharif
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
68match
adrianomiranda.com
AFM
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
68match
adysonpeacock.com
Adyson Peacock
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
68match
cayatull.com
Caya Tull
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
66match
hola-luis.com
Graphic and interactive design
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
66match
adrian-regalado.com
adrian regalado
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
66match
bonzzoatef.com
BonzZo Atef
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
64match
bazziergraphik.com
bazzier studio
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
63match
makotosaito.com
Makoto Saito
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
63match
janejacoy.com
Jane Jacoy
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.