similar sites

Sites similar to bogglebooks.com

Home Page · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

rosemariechr.com

Rose-Maries litteratur- og filmblogg – – stadig på leting etter bøker og filmer som gir noe ekstra! Reklamefri og uavhengig blogg med gode lese- og filmtips! Jeg deler også reisetips, dikt og annet.

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Forside - Jon Gangdal

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Calculating Infinity -

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Del En Klem - Den koseligste siden i Norge

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

nochistudio.com

Just another blog

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Rimordbok (nødrimordbok) - søk etter ord som rimer på...

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

memoofnorway.com

Memo of Norway AS – Notatbøker og skrivesaker

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

jernbanefrua.com

Jernbanefrua – Bøker og lesepauser ⭐️ Bente Mari

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Ord fra nord – Eva Salhus Winther sine skriverier

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Bjørn Olavs Blog

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

cecilieseim.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Min lesekrok – En blogg om bøker <3

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bjerkelienforlag.com

Bjerkelien Forlag – Bjerkelien Forlag

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.