Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bogdangrigore.com

Paul-Bogdan Grigore | Level Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
inversionchamber.com
Level Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
felixfaeh.com
Felix Faeh – Level Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
matthulse.com
Matt Hulse | Level Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
mateomancera.com
Mateo Mancera — Level Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
theodorehilhorst.com
Theodore Hilhorst – Level designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
arjunkurapati.com
Kurapati Arjun – Game & Level Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
maxpkenny.com
Max Kenny | Game Designer, Level Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
maxtishakov.com
Max Tishakov – Game and level designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
benstoddard.com
Ben Stoddard - Level Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
mathiasneukam.com
Mathias Neukam – Level & Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
alexisarenas.net
Alexis Arenas - Game & Level Designer Portfolio | Alexis Arenas
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
grigoriangames.com
Home | Grigorian Games
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
aacat.net
AAcat | Game and Visual Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
interactivitiesink.com
Mike Young: Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
intink.com
Mike Young: Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
aashkxn.com
Ashkan A. | Lead Artist & Creative Designer.
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
piyushsain.com
Level Designer | Piyush Sain | Game Development Portfolio | Piyush Sain
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
rkleyn.com
Ramana Kleyn - Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.