Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to bogaardsdesign.com

Terri Bogaards · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
85match
elissavalentine.com
Elissa Valentine
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
75match
jennbarone.com
jennifer barone > creative
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
75match
hojoonjon.com
HOJOON JON
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
75match
hola-carlos.com
Carlos Pabon
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
70match
mancymau.com
Mancy Mau UX/Product Design Portfolio
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
70match
jimcrosley.com
Jim Crosley
1 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
70match
hanazarrouk.com
Hana zarrouk - product designer
1 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
70match
haneensaqer.com
Haneen Saqer, PhD, MHA
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
70match
girishm.com
Girish Masand
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
65match
kellyqpham.com
kellyqpham
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
65match
mandizhou.com
Mandi Zhou
1 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
65match
jarretlevin.com
Jarret Levin
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
65match
jinminoren.com
Jin Mi Noren
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
65match
haserickdesign.com
Briana Haserick
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
65match
heypei.com
PEI HSIEH
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
65match
aditinettar.com
Aditi Nettar
1 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
65match
aewall.com
Ann-Elise Wall
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
65match
agahidesign.com
Agahi Design
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.