Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to boeker.net

Über mich | Michael Böker · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
62match
r-huber.de 🇩🇪
Raphael Huber – Webseiten & Software
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
6ka-digital.com
6KA • Sie befinden sich auf unserer Übersichtsseite
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
runcishop.de 🇩🇪
Julian IT - Foren-Übersicht
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
fconnection.com
Websites und Software-Tools | Zürich | fconnection: Fconnection
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
server-4-me.de 🇩🇪
Günter Maier
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
richardvieweg.com
Richard Vieweg
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
schubertdaniel.de 🇩🇪
Ich bin Daniel
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
schober-services.de 🇩🇪
Schober Services
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
sieglitzhof.de 🇩🇪
Home | martin-ot.de
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
cmodao.com
Amber Fuel | The CMO DAO
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
bocombo.net
Herzlich Willkommen - BOCOMBO
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
bocombo.org
Herzlich Willkommen - BOCOMBO
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
marius-olbrich.com
Marius Olbrich — Portfolio 2026
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
rubyfox.de 🇩🇪
Anmeldung erforderlich – RubyFox
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
cms-vereine.com
CMS|VEREINE - Kontrolle über Ihren Verein
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
familie-moeckel.com
Herzlich willkommen! | Familie Möckel
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
social-cooperate.com
Herzlich willkommen! | social-cooperate.com
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
polski-supermarkt.de 🇩🇪
Herzlich willkommen! | Polski Supermarket
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.