similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to bodatorp.com

Bodatorps Tomtägareförening · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

Ådrans Tomtägareförening | Gemenskap i Ådran

1 shared topicsland-and-farms

markagarkonsulten.com

Markägarkonsulten Lars Rubensson AB | Uppdrag fastighetsrätt

1 shared topicsland-and-farms

Pilgården – Gårdsliv och självhushållning i Skåne

1 shared topicsland-and-farms

bergsjoholm.com

Bergsjöholm – Ett modernt lantbruk med historiska anor

1 shared topicsland-and-farms

Arrendera.com – Hyr mark enkelt och tryggt

1 shared topicsland-and-farms

Hitta & dela odlingsmark och lokala odlingar | Grow Gothenburg - odlingskarta

1 shared topicsland-and-farms

ingvalsby gård – …liten men god…

1 shared topicsland-and-farms

1 shared topicsland-and-farms

Korpoströms Gård · En gård med historiska anor i hjärtat av skärgården

1 shared topicsland-and-farms

rippanordic.com

Gårdsman.se – Minigrävare, vedmaskiner & Skid Steers

1 shared topicsland-and-farms

bergkvistsiljan.com

Bergkvist Siljan är en naturlig samarbetspartner för skogsägare

1 shared topicsland-and-farms

Koppombär - Försäljning av bär och svamp

1 shared topicsland-and-farms

Askelids odlingar – Utmarkens grönsaker, bär och plantor

1 shared topicsland-and-farms

BOBACKEN | Mobil: 070 – 530 85 59

1 shared topicsland-and-farms

ferettimakleri.com

Feretti Mäkleri AB

1 shared topicsland-and-farms

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.