Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bobbyzhu.com

Boqi (Bobby) Zhu · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
bobbydoshi.com
Bobby Doshi
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bobbygenalo.com
Bobby Genalo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bobbysithub.com
Bobby's IT Hub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bobbydeveloper.com
Bobby developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
feduks.com
feduks
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
bobbotapp.com
bobbotapp
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
kylearector.com
Kyle Rector
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
rodriguezs.dev
J's Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
bobbyencoded.com
BobbyEncoded | Software Engineering Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
inspectorradar.com
Inspector Alert
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
niavra.com
Niavra | Vector
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
solo-stackdirectory.com
Solo-Stack Directory -
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
feedbagel.com
FeedBagel - RSS Feed Directory
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
growthetechselector.com
Webinars | The Tech Selector
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
faradyn.com
Faradyn Interconnector Auction Platform
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
bennyvbonora.com
Ben Bonora — Director of Engineering | Seattle
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
blusup.com
BluSup | Local Web Apps, Guides, and Directories
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
lancesaxerud.com
Lance Saxerud | Engineer. Drummer. Director.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.