Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bobbydonev.com

Bobby Donev - Web Carpenter · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
alexcarpenter.me
Alex Carpenter
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
bobbyquilacio.com
Bobby Quilacio | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
alexgladd.dev
Alex Gladd {DEV} - Web and software development
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
andyghp.dev
Andy González Hübner-Pettersson — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
belsthomaz.dev
Isabella Thomaz
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
bhavishya.dev
Bhavishya Sahdev - Senior Full-Stack Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
1wei.dev
Yiwei Ho
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
0xraghu.com
0xRaghu - Web3 Developer Relations
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
ksotirow.dev
Home | K. Sotirow - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
maximilianhagelstam.com
Maximilian Hagelstam
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
robbycodes.com
Robby Hecht Website
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
anjs.dev
neinja.dev - Home
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
alexwd.me
Alex Allen - Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andrewscottcarter.com
Andrew Carter
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ashutoshtiwari.dev
Ashutosh Tiwari — Software Engineer | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
donbellamy.com
Don Bellamy | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
gssimao.com
Gabriel Simao Portfolio web projects and games
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
lajilao.com
naiba - Web3 Builder & Open Source Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.