Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bmunger.com

Brian Munger - User Experience Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
dipanshah.com
Dipan Shah | User Experience Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
75match
andrewofficer.com
Andrew Officer | User Experience Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
75match
gemobu.com
Gerardo Morales | User Experience Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
caiocpimenta.com
Caio Pimenta – User Experience Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
dileeshvisuals.com
:: DileeshVisuals :: User Experience Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
jacktowery.com
Jack Towery • Product & User Experience Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
annaagliardi.com
Anna Agliardi – User Experience Designer | Berlin
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
jacquelinerider.com
Jacqueline Rider – User Experience Design
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
anniiket.com
anniiket pandit | user experience design portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
susanytan.com
Susan Tan | Digital Experience Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
anushkasrivastava.com
Anushka Srivastava | user experience design portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
piyushkiranrai.com
Piyush Rai - Digital Experience Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
annanicoli.com
anna nicoli – User Experience by Design
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
lynnshade.com
Shadeworks: User Experience Research & Design
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
rinachang.com
Rina Chang | User Experience and Interaction Design
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
ringseis.com
Michael Ringseis – User Experience (UX) Design
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
dilekbulut.com
Dilek Bulut – Learning Experience Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
sanerstudio.ch 🇨🇭
Sanerstudio – Editorial Design + User Experience
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.