Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bmjjournal.com

BMJ Journal · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
cliniques-ster.com
ClinSter Journal -
1 shared topicsmedical-health
70match
clinicalnexusjournal.com
Clinica Nexus Journal
1 shared topicsmedical-health
68match
newjournalurology.com
The New Journal of Urology
1 shared topicsmedical-health
68match
mathewsjournal.com
Mathews Openaccess Journals
1 shared topicsmedical-health
67match
asean-journal-radiology.org
The ASEAN Journal of Radiology
1 shared topicsmedical-health
67match
clinicalhealthjournal.com
News | Clinical Health Journal
1 shared topicsmedical-health
67match
kumcj.com
Kushtia Medical College Journal
1 shared topicsmedical-health
67match
rn-journal.com
Journal of Nursing | RN Journal
1 shared topicsmedical-health
66match
gtpham.com
My Medical Journey
1 shared topicsmedical-health
66match
bhjournal.org
Bombay Hospital Journal – BHJ
1 shared topicsmedical-health
66match
rjmsonline.com
Research Journal of Medical Science
1 shared topicsmedical-health
66match
familyhealthjourney.com
Family Health Journey
1 shared topicsmedical-health
65match
intjmi.com
Journal of Emergency Health Care
1 shared topicsmedical-health
65match
thenanopost.com
The Nano Post – Health News Journal
1 shared topicsmedical-health
65match
internationaljhd.com
International Journal of Health Disciplines
1 shared topicsmedical-health
65match
thepracticalmedicine.com
The Practical Medicine — Journal Homepage
1 shared topicsmedical-health
65match
mathepidemi.com
Journal of Mathematical Epidemiology
1 shared topicsmedical-health
64match
phsujournal.com
Ponce Health Sciences University Scientific Journal
1 shared topicsmedical-health

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.