Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bmendo.dev

Brian Mendoza, Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
rohangore.com
Rohan Gore - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
matyasfodor.com
Matyas Fodor Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
kylepaulsen.com
Kyle Paulsen, Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
alexiwisteria.dev
Alex Lee | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
andrewbadams.com
Andrew Adams | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
aaronpetcoff.me
Aaron Petcoff, software engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
mayurzala.com
Mayur Zala - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
greglafauci.com
Greg LaFauci | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
krissolui.com
Kris Lui | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
romaura.com
Robbin Ramos - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
andybangs.dev
Andy Bangs | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
pierres.dev
Pierre Smith | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
rizkyzhang.com
Home | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
rjlaasish.com
Aasish Rijal | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
romko.dev
Roman Kornig | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
alexcali.me
Alex Cali | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
abhishekpandey.tech
Abhishek Pandey | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
pirooz.dev
Pirooz Ekhtiyari | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.