Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bmabsout.com

Bassel El Mabsout · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
therobotscientist.com
Aditya Parameshwaran | PhD Candidate | Formal Verification & Robotics
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
ahkhan.me
Ameer H. Khan — Academic CV
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
robertomartinmartin.com
- Roberto Martín-Martín
2 shared topicsrobotics
64match
alexandervanlanschot.com
Alexander van Lanschot - Duke Graduate & AI Researcher
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
agentic-intelligence-lab.org
Agentic Intelligence Lab
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
benjaminliu.me
Benjamin Liu - Portfolio
2 shared topicsrobotics
63match
alexshao.net
Alex Shao
2 shared topicsrobotics
63match
mbhafez.com
Muhammad Burhan Hafez, Ph.D.
2 shared topicsrobotics
63match
drunkcoder.dev
Gautham Raju — CV Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
a2r-lab.org
A²R Lab
2 shared topicsrobotics
63match
robotslearnhere.com
Robots Learn Here
2 shared topicsrobotics
63match
themisares.com
THEMISARES | Advanced Technology Consultancy
2 shared topicsrobotics
63match
theroboticsoul.com
Rama Krishna Prasad Kandukuri
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
andrewli.info
Andrew Li — CS & Robotics @ Georgia Tech
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
neuroide.com
Neuroide | Technical Research Across Perception, Intelligence, and Action
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
piolopatag.com
Piolo Patag | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
theresa-law.com
Theresa Law
2 shared topicsrobotics
62match
rohit-menon.com
Rohit Menon | Robotics Research
2 shared topicsrobotics

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.