Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to blurtec.com

Blurtec · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
bluroodev.com
BluRooDev
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
softwareconfidence.com
Software Confidence | Build software with confidence
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
intertects.com
Intertects - Software Engineering
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
bluestonetech.net
Bluestone Consulting
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
softwarecrisis.dev
Out of the Software Crisis: The Newsletter
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
domain85.com
Domain 85
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
piceno.dev
Piceno
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
nasoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
andrzejewsky.com
Patryk Andrzejewski
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
adinschmidt.com
Adin Schmidt — Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
nexoragroup.dev
Nexora Group
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
andrewmalchow.com
Andrew Malchow
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
andrewkhan.dev
Andrew Khan | Tech Lead
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
dockone.app
DockOne
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
kuamka.com
Kuamka -
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
alejandropch.com
Alejandro Pachas
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
alexforsyth.io
Alex Forsyth
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
alexsh.me
Alex Hollander - Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.