Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to blundersurfer.com

Blundersurfer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
alexunderwood.net
Alex's Homelab Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
blunderingcode.com
Blundering Code
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
thequantumwell.com
The Quantum Well
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
billsaunders.dev
Bill Saunders
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
iponderus.com
iponderus
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
aspear.net
Anders Spear
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
gregmundy.com
greg mundy
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
angio.net
Dave Andersen
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
adamparrish.net
Parrish Ponders
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
rlodhiya.dev
Ritwik Lodhiya | Engineer, Problem Solver
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
bradleyharner.com
Bradley Harner
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
nevoef.com
Nevo Efraty - Nevo’s blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
ishaanchawla.com
Ishaan Chawla
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
therammuppalla.com
Ram Muppalla — Builder, Technologist, Thinker
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
djenriquez.dev
Dexter Jethro Enriquez — Software Developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
aadamali.net
Home - Aadam Ali
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
pietro.app
Pietro's blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
rjbofficial.com
RJBOfficial - Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.