Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bluetrolleypress.com

Home | Blue Trolley Press · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
bluetreepress.com
Home - Blue Tree Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
71match
bodgerbooks.com
Home | Bodger Books
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
69match
fauvepress.com
Fauve Press | Independent Publisher
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
aberdeenunipress.org
Home | Aberdeen University Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
bfgpress.com
BFG PRESS - Home
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
2blstudio.com
Home | Two Black Lions Studio
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
afrihillpress.com
Home - Afrihill Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
theorangepress.com
The Orange Press Home Page
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
kukishinhanbo.com
Home - Kihon Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
bluewatertales.com
Home - Blue Water Tales, LLC
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
inspiremepress.com
Home - Inspire Me Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
berestapress.com
Beresta Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
blueearbooks.com
Blue Ear Books
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
3llamapress.com
3 LLAMA PRESS - Home | 3 Llama Press | Book Brokerage
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
adlumenpress.org
Ad Lumen Press - Home
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
bluefoxpress.com
BlueFox Press - Book Publishing Company
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
sofawolf.com
Sofawolf Press Inc
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
sociologypress.com
Sociology Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.