Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bluesquarecoding.com

Blue Square Coding - Software Engineering · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
alfredojahn.dev
Alfredo Jahn | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
isnayousuf.com
Isna Yousuf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
fdaniall.com
Fakhri Danial | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
rogelioorts.com
Rogelio Orts - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
pidiawara.com
Pape Ibrahima Diawara - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
sooties.com
Sooties — Software Engineering Agency
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
ahmadx.dev
Ahmad Hassan - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
mayakano.com
Maya Kano - Software Enginner
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
adarshyadav.dev
Adarsh Yadav - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
ashutoshnanaware.dev
Ashutosh Nanaware — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
mauryakaran.com
Karan Maurya - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
adrianlara.org
Adrian Lara | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
nickreis.com
Nicholas Reis | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
andrewmoses.dev
AM - Software Engineer | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
ahmedsabbir.dev
Sabbir Ahmed - Software Engineer & Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
benrogers.dev
Ben Rogers | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
3lt.dev
3LT — Software Engineering Studio
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
isaxcode.com
Mohammed Isa — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.