Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to blueriderpress.com

Dutton - Penguin Books · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
bluecrownbooks.com
Blue Crown Books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
featbooks.com
Feat Books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
thenationreprints.com
The Nation - PARS
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
bigtenopenbooks.org
Home | Big Ten Open Books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
ronin-books.com
Ronin Books — Independent Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
newbaybooks.com
Home | New Bay Books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
guccibook.com
Gucci Books - Publishing Platform
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
guccibooks.com
Gucci Books - Publishing Platform
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
phoenixpublishinggroup.com
Phoenix Books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
masterbooksus.com
Home | MasterBooks
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
newnationbooks.com
New Nation Books | Independent Book Publisher
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
bluegeckobooks.com
Home | Blue Gecko Books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
diversifiedbooksgroup.com
Diversified Books Group | Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
softwoodbooks.com
Softwood Books home page
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
cliobooks.ai
Cliobooks | Book Writing Software
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
coalhillbooks.com
Coal Hill Books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
domainsforbooks.com
Home - Domains for Books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
newrealmbooks.com
New Realm Books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.