Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bluecaret.com

BlueCaret^ · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
kiamich.com
Kiamich
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
kierangregg.com
Kieran Gregg
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
2bf.io
Two Blue Feet
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
pawelkawalec.com
Paweł Kawalec
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
patapon.io
Michaël Darmes
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
anasismailkhan.com
Anas Ismail Khan
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
anomalyblueprint.com
Anomaly Blueprint
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
sintim-koree.com
Michael Sintim-Koree
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
andrewkhan.dev
Andrew Khan | Tech Lead
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
skybluetech.dev
Skybluetech | Paul Ehrhardt
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
acksyn.org
Michele's Blog | Michele's Blog
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
argonauts-it.org
Argonauts-IT Ltd | Sharing Room
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
bhittani.com
kamalkhan (Kamal Khan) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
2bluecapital.com
2Blue — apps, tools & publications
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
khangmai.com
Khang Mai — Lead Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
makemydickadildo.com
CosmicJules (Michael O'Neill) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
kisielos.com
ciessielski (Michał Ciesielski) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
nak5.com
Nevada Kent - Android / Full-Stack Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.