Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to blackkspydo.com

blackkspydo · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
andrewsoteriou.net
AndrewLS — Software Engineer | C++, Flutter & Python
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewls.dev
AndrewLS — Software Engineer | C++, Flutter & Python
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewls.net
AndrewLS — Software Engineer | C++, Flutter & Python
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewls.org
AndrewLS — Software Engineer | C++, Flutter & Python
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
maxburson.com
Max Burson
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
alex-abraham.dev
Alex Abraham | Software Engineering Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewsturman.com
Andrew Sturman | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
mathiassm.com
MathiasSM - Software Development Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
rookieslab.com
Rookie's Lab - Ravi Ojha's Blog · rookieslab.com
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
pembrokesoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Pembroke Software
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
aaccurso.me
Alan Accurso
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
nextdoorhacker.com
NextDoorHacker
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
robertwpearce.com
Robert Pearce
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
robjdavey.com
RobJDavey
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
arkelziko.com
Arkel Ziko
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewtatham.com
Andrew Tatham
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
arkoisystems.com
$ cat ./arkoisystems
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
romanboba.com
Roman Boba
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.