Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to biohackdir.com

Search Home - BioHackDIr · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
bioscentre.org
Home - Bios Centre
2 shared topicsmedical-health
70match
bioscentre.com
Home - Bios Centre
2 shared topicsmedical-health
67match
roviaclinical.com
Home - Rovia Clinical Research
2 shared topicsmedical-health
66match
mediceresearch.com
MEDICE HEALTH RESEARCH - Home
2 shared topicsmedical-health
66match
medhave.com
Home - Medhave
2 shared topicsmedical-health
66match
medilexmedical.com
Home - Medilex
2 shared topicsmedical-health
66match
medicalequiptech.com
Home - MET Intl
2 shared topicsmedical-health
66match
medvision-ks.com
Home - MedVision
2 shared topicsmedical-health
66match
biogladuz.com
Home - Biogladuz Healthscience Private Limited
2 shared topicsmedical-health
65match
medicaldevicelab.com
Medical Home - Medical Devices
2 shared topicsmedical-health
65match
medicorresearch.com
Medicor Research Inc.
2 shared topicsmedical-health
64match
medparts.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - Medical Partners Ltd
2 shared topicsmedical-health
64match
sumbermurni.com
Home - Sumber Murni Alkesindo
2 shared topicsmedical-health
64match
medizoneinternational.com
Home - Medizone International
2 shared topicsmedical-health
64match
finnixclinical.com
Home - Finnix Clinical Trial Group
2 shared topicsmedical-health
64match
mediclarisclinicalresearch.com
Mediclaris Clinical Research - Home | Ethical Trials Meaningful Discoveries
2 shared topicsmedical-health
64match
mediclaris.com
Mediclaris Clinical Research - Home | Ethical Trials Meaningful Discoveries
2 shared topicsmedical-health
64match
optimumclinicaltrial.com
Home - Optimum Clinical Trial Group
2 shared topicsmedical-health

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.