Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to billysamplecode.com

BillySampleCode | Home Page · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
anotherconstruct.com
Home Page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
pavithrabasiccoding.com
Home Page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
paulhoule.com
Paul Houle home page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
amelon.org
Home page | Melon blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
digitaldan.co.uk 🇬🇧
DigitalDan - Home Page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
develpeer.com
Home | Develpeer’s Home Page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
dhruvbird.com
Dhruv Matani's Home Page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
axiomaticlanguage.org
Axiomatic Language Home Page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
the-comfy-coder.com
Home Page <3 the-comfy-coder
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
chastucker.com
Home Page of the Website.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
diegolavalle.com
Diego Lavalle | Home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
paulmueser.com
Paul Müser | Homepage
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
alandonovan.net
Alan Donovan | Alan Donovan’s home page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
alekad.net
Dirivial | Home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
alg0rithm.dev
Alg0rithm | Home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
akahn.net
Alex Kahn | Home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
6furlongs.com
Taka's programme page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
charlesleifer.com
charles leifer | Home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.