Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to billycastelli.com

Billy Castelli · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
billybunn.io
Billy Bunn
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
billykorando.com
Billy Korando
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
benc.io
Ben Cooper
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
billyhawkes.com
Billy Hawkes
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
arnav-sethi.com
Arnav Sethi | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
masonlancaster.com
Mason Lancaster
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
mathiasbc.com
MathiasBC | Software Architect
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
theohayeck.com
Theo Hayeck
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
mattriese.com
Matt Riese - Software/Hovercraft Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
mauro-castillo.com
Mauro Castillo
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
andrewfiel.me
Andrew Fiel
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
billboggs.dev
Bill Boggs
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
kunal.app
Kunal Sinha
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
thejus03.com
Thejus Unnikrishnan
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
pierrerambaud.com
Pierre Rambaud - Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
kumarashish.com
Ashish Kumar | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
mattsibson.com
Matt Sibson - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
spaminator.com
Robert Steven Buchanan | spaminator.com
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.