Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to billybrown.dev

Billy Brown | Developer Profile · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
matthewbrowndev.com
Matthew Brown | Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
assassxn.dev
Assassxn | Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
ronenjain.com
Ronen Jain | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
bidev.me
BI Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
boholladay.com
Bo Holladay | Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
andrewpauluhn.dev
AWP Developer Blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
andrewbeaver.dev
Andrew Beaver | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
abhishekrazy.com
Abhishek Razy | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
bnhsoftware.dev
Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
somedeveloperblog.com
Some Developer Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
andrewrobles.dev
Andrew Robles | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
bhanucharank.dev
Bhanu Charan K | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
akshayk.dev
Akshay Kalathil | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
2ipper.com
2ipper — Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
anotherdeveloperblog.dev
Another Developer Blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
billydavis.dev
Billy Davis — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
4devs.app
Online Developer Tools
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
matheka.dev
Software Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.