Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to billelind.dev

Anders' Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
dominicwild.com
Dominic Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
a-mkemp.com
A-M Kemp Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
72match
kshammout.com
Kareem | Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
72match
kudlanov.com
Kudlanov Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
72match
matrixjava.dev
Terminal Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
bhargav.tech
Bhargav's Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
binaryx.cloud
Rafael's Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
kuroashi.dev
Andrew's Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
70match
abuffseagull.dev
ABuffSeagull's Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
bharadhwaj-k.tech
Bharadhwaj K | Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
masonrwilliams.com
Mason Williams Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
anishmahajan.tech
Anish Mahajan | Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
70match
andybarringer.com
Andy Barringer | Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
69match
maxaiello.com
Max Aiello — CS Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
bhaveshmishra.dev
Home • Bhavesh's Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
fardinkhan.com
Farabi - Developer Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
andrewlethbridge.com
Andrew Lethbridge's Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
belastr.dev
Béla Struffolino - Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.