Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bigpixel.net

Juliana Yamashita | UX & Data Visualization Designer Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
bodaesign.com
bodaesign -- design-driven AI
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
akshat.me
Akshat Mishra | Design Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
insomniacdeziner.com
Michelle Andrews Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
acsahstanley.com
Acsah Stanley | Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
arnonfriedman.com
Arnon Friedman | Product Designer | UX | AI
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
agenticdesigner.ai
Agentic Designer | Mike Lang
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
argenisalvarez.com
Argenis Alvarez — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
thesamadekunle.com
Sam Adekunle - Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
solimanshaban.com
Soliman Shaban | Principal Product Designer in Dubai
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
felixjanemalm.com
Felix Janemalm – Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
feifeideng.com
Feifei Deng — UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
kuanrrr.com
Kuan Chen, product designer who builds with AI
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
roksanapaluch.com
Roksana Paluch — Product System Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
mauriciowolff.com
Mauricio Wolff - AI Product Designer - @bitbonsai
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
andrewwhited.com
Andrew Whited · Staff product designer · AI, agentic systems, enterprise platforms, information architecture
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
kylechuises.com
Kyle Chuises - Senior Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
rominakochura.com
Romina Kochura — Lead Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
andrewcdesign.com
Andrew Christopher — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.