Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bigmacindex.org

The Big Mac Index — Historical Data from the Economist’s Big Mac Index · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
aheadarchive.org
AHEAD - A project to democratize economic historical data
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
rogercooper.com
rogercooper.com – My personal website and the World Historical Economic Database
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
fedaeconomist.com
Index - FEDA - The Ecnomist News Magazine
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
thepubliceconomist.com
The Public Economist - The Policy Monitor
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
aneconomicsense.org
An Economic Sense | It's the Economy, Stupid!
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
aboutphiliphbrown.net
Philip H Brown Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
adamgeorge.me
Adam George | Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
theniconomics.com
The Niconomics - Deciphering The Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
piaandres.com
Pia Andres – Technological Change and Environmental Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
socialisteconomist.com
Socialist Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
fatih.ai
Fatih Kansoy — Economist, University of Oxford
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
thelondoneconomic.com
The London Economic
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
bodulieu.com
Download Economics Data for Research & Analysis
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
alexandermackay.org
Alexander MacKay | Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
kwasnica.com
Tony Kwasnica Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
theodorecaputi.com
Theodore L. Caputi — Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
thepolishmiracle.com
The Polish Miracle — Poland's Economic Transformation in Data
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
maxbnorton.com
Max B. Norton | Economist | Senior Associate, CRA
1 shared topicseconomy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.