Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bigfug.com

Alex May · Software Archive · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
aumsoftware.co.in 🇮🇳
Aum Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
ilmsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
ILM Software LTD
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
aleksandre.net
Alex Apkhaidze - Software Architect and Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
msssoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
MSS Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
astrobe.com
CFB Software - Astrobe
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
atisoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
ATI Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
itacsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
iTAC Software AG
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
omegasoftwares.in 🇮🇳
Omega Software Solutions
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
bunkersoftware.com
Bunker Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
jrb-software.com
JRB Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
blackfishsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Black Fish Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
swsoftwaresolutions.co.uk 🇬🇧
SW Software Solutions
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
holohansoftware.com
Holohan Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
atechsoftware.net
Atech Software LLC
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
attractor-software.com
Attractor Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
attractor-studio.com
Attractor Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
attractorsoftware.com
Attractor Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
egrsoftware.com
EGR Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.