similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to bible613.org

613 – Les Commandements de la Bible · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

DJ Smailes – Writing

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

alanmikhail.org

Alan Mikhail – Yale University

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

biblescholarclassics.com

Bible Scholar Classics – Books

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

FARNEVIS – Learn Farsi Language!

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

roanox – t-4-2

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Betsy McCall – polymath

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Res Cogitans – I am a thinking thing

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Nic Edu – Nic Edu

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

RJ Meza – Writer.

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

The Lemois – Life Coaching

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

arscommunis.com

ARS Communis – Literatura en español desde Estados Unidos

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

interestingscenes.com

Interesting Scenes – Moments of a distant life.

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Home – Maximus Rex

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Ron Rindo – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ronbatesauthor.com

Ron Bates – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Reggianie Francois – Musings

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

andyanderegg.com

Andy Anderegg – Andy Anderegg

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.