Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bhargav.tech

Bhargav's Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
hammamrawabdeh.com
Hammam Rawabdeh — Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
bhaveshmishra.dev
Home • Bhavesh's Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
73match
matrixjava.dev
Terminal Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
abuffseagull.dev
ABuffSeagull's Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
brianzanti.com
Brian Zanti - Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
72match
billelind.dev
Anders' Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
dominicwild.com
Dominic Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
kuroashi.dev
Andrew's Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
71match
kshammout.com
Kareem | Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
71match
kudlanov.com
Kudlanov Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
71match
binaryx.cloud
Rafael's Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
bharadhwaj-k.tech
Bharadhwaj K | Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
masonrwilliams.com
Mason Williams Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
andrewlethbridge.com
Andrew Lethbridge's Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
fardinkhan.com
Farabi - Developer Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
maxaiello.com
Max Aiello — CS Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
bruceyulin.com
Bruce Yu Lin | Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
dnatanmai.com
Deepak N. - Full Stack Developer - Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.