Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bgamble.dev

Benjamin Gamble · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
benjaminpjacobs.com
Benjamin Jacobs
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
bmuschko.com
Benjamin Muschko
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
benjaminrcollins.com
Benjamin Collins Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
bentohset.dev
Benjamin Toh's Website
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
benjaminhammack.com
Benjamin Hammack - Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
benbirkhahn.com
Benjamin Birkhahn | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
rnascimento.com
Rod's Connection Strings - a place for random and geeky things %
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
pingxg.com
Pingxin Gao
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
robinahmed.com
Robin's Rambles
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
angelfernandezgambin.com
Angel Fernandez Gambin
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
bensadik.net
Home | Ben Sadik
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
krisshen.com
Kris Shen
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
maximkaz.com
Maxim Kazantsev
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
nickcassab.com
Nick Cassab AIA
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
neuralnewshub.com
Neural News Hub – Your central source for AI and LLM news
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
neuracurve.com
Neuracurve
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
aadarshsonkamble.dev
Aadarsh Sonkamble | Backend & AI Systems Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
arminzavada.com
Ármin Zavada
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.