Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bfinan.com

Brendan Finan · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
billingsleycustomsoftware.com
Brendan Billingsley
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
andyyhy.com
andyyhy - Andy Yu Han Yang
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
paulomartinez.com
Paulo Martinez | Personal website
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
amonoyflow.com
Flow
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
malnushi.com
Home
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
igrali.com
Igor's personal website
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
ilzekoning.com
Hello from Ilze Koning | Ilze Koning
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
paulrevere4.com
Paul Revere, IV
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
abqcampbells.com
Home • Roger Campbell
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
chiragbhansali.com
Chirag Bhansali
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
pateltarang.com
Tarang
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
tenteromano.com
Phil Tenteromano, Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
simonwg.com
Simon Westlin Green
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
bhavika.dev
Bhavika Tekwani
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
andrewmorrison.dev
Andrew Morrison | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
devenney.io
Brendan Devenney — Staff Software Engineer, Edinburgh
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
patricmeier.com
Hi, I'm Patric
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
simonsickle.com
Mark Simon Sickle
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.