Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to beverlylatimer.com

Beverly Latimer – Author Profile · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
tessgalati.com
Tess Galati – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
khmayfield.com
Kimberly Mayfield – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
paulkaplanauthor.com
Paul Kaplan Author – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
alybrownbooks.com
Aly Brown – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
ilirninaauthor.com
Ilir Nina – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
remelton.com
RE Melton – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
andreapitzer.com
Andrea Pitzer – Author and Journalist
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
beverlyheathbooks.com
Beverly C. Heath — Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
paulsorak.com
Paul Sorak – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
annahaines.net
Anna Haines – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
terripicone.com
Terri Picone – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
andysilvers.com
Andy Silvers – Author – Filmmaker
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
devonmaxwell.com
Devon Maxwell – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
kimcantin.com
Kim Cantin – Author & Speaker
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
terakelley.com
Tera Kelley – Author & Editor
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
angelamenziesbooks.com
Angela Menzies – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
denisemahaneyauthor.com
Denise Mahaney – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
denelecampbell.com
denelecampbell – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.