Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to beverly-cc.com

BEVERLY | DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
evanshieh.com
EMERGENT | Design • Research
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
chenxicui.com
Chenxi Cui | Design Researcher
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
andrewdaikkim.com
Andrew Daik Kim Design | Design
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
researchimaginings.com
Research Imagining | Travels in Design Research
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
andyjhlai.com
Andy Lai | Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
anushachanda.com
Anusha Chanda Portfolio | Design Researcher | London, UK
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
anekaraj.com
Aneka Raj — Researcher & Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
anjaneidhardtmokoena.com
Anja Neidhardt-Mokoena – Design researcher and educator (PhD)
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
pcwdesign.com
pcw design | peter c wong | design + creative
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
evacelem.com
Eva Célem | Design & Research
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
angel-alcala.com
Angel Alcala Design | Design
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
amvmdesign.com
DESIGN | AMVM Design
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
antonmikkonen.com
Anton Mikkonen Design | Design
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
bexieleighdesign.com
BexieLeigh Design | Design and Art Direction
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
dengninghe.com
Dengning Flora He | Product Designer & Researcher | Boston
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
bethmarcue.com
BETH MARCUE DESIGN - Design
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
andreyaveintimilla.com
Human-Centered Design Research and Strategy | Andreya Veintimilla
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
paulwagnerdesign.com
Paul Wagner : Book Design & Graphic Design
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.