Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bester.com

Bester, Inc. · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
gluesolutions.io
gluesolutions, inc.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
4g-eng.com
4G ENG, Inc
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
chi-square-works.com
The Chi-Square Works, Inc.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
maketested.com
MakeTested
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
gmfoster.com
Greg Foster
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
5cps.com
Home - Stackr Inc.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
slick-engineering.com
Slick Engineering & Consulting, Inc. | Instruments, not apps.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
alchemy-power.com
- Alchemy Power Inc.®
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
simonkaran.com
Simon Karan
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
simonzheng.com
Simon Zheng
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
pasterix.com
Pasterix
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
achester88.dev
Home | achester88
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ethanspaulding.com
Mike Meyers | engineer, inventor, author
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
simonlb.com
Simon Leboucher
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
testeract.com
Testeract | Test Systems Built to Evolve
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
colchesterdigital.org.uk 🇬🇧
Colchester Digital
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
simonbreiter.com
Simon Breiter | Projects
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
nathanksou.dev
nathan sou — builder, traveler, indie dev
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.