similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to bertrandediteur.com

Accueil - Groupe Bertrand éditeur · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

gros-ragout.com

Accueil - Gros Ragoût

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Accueil - Gros Ragoût

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Accueil - ALCA31

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Accueil - Ar Furik éditions

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

aldianashop.net

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

blogakatombo.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Accueil - Matahami

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

amisdecolette.fr 🇫🇷

Accueil - Les amis de Colette

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

digitbooks.fr 🇫🇷

Accueil - Digit Books

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

cleyrianeeditions.com

PAGE D'ACCUEIL -

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

groupecourteechelle.com

Groupe d'édition la courte échelle | Accueil - GECE

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

rodolpheviemont.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

amisdeproust.fr 🇫🇷

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Accueil - FCbyus

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

desirdelire.fr 🇫🇷

Accueil - Désirdelire

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Accueil - The Small Reset

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

aux2elephants.fr 🇫🇷

Accueil - Aux Deux Eléphants

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.