Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bergmanwrites.com

Bergman Writes – Mike Bergman · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
andy-southall.com
Andy Southall – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
andysouthall.com
Andy Southall – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
maureenfischer.com
MaureenFischer – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
anneburchettwrites.com
Anne Burchett Writes – Sharing Stories
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
dldotbailey.com
D.L. Bailey – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
romosreadingroom.com
K.L. Romo – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
annhallwrites.com
Ann Hall Writes – Marking my path, one book at a time
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
arilord.com
Ari Lord – Writer & Editor
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
kurtbaumeister.com
Kurt Baumeister – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
ktenhagen.com
Katie E. ten Hagen – Editor, Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
djamilaibrahim.com
Djamila Ibrahim – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
mauralammers.com
Maura Lammers – writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
gretastoneauthor.com
Greta Stone – Poet & Fiction Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
dlanesharp.com
D. Lane Sharp – writer
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
rococotheorywriting.com
Rococotheory Writes – By Martina Adovica.
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
beneaththescars.org
mariafonsecawrites – Beneath the Scars
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
robwheelerwrites.com
Rob Wheeler Writes – Spilling the ink of dreams
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
rolandoandresramos.com
Rolando Andrés Ramos – Writer | Educator
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.