Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bergauer.org

Thomas Bergauer – Work-Related Webpage · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
nicholasbeaton.com
Personal webpage of Nicholas Beaton
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
alexkutana.net
Alex Kutana's webpage - Welcome
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
piotr-machura.com
Personal webpage - Piotr Machura
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
pietlammers.com
Webpage of Piet Lammers
2 shared topicsphysics
62match
closetrail.com
How wings work
2 shared topicsphysics
62match
acfelab.org
Home – ACFE Lab
2 shared topicsscience
62match
mathrelativity.com
Mathematics of Relativity
2 shared topicsphysics
62match
robertoliva.com
Robert Oliva – CV & Software
2 shared topicsphysics
62match
adarshiyer.net
Home Page | Adarsh Iyer's Website
2 shared topicsphysics
61match
divitt.com
Dr. Shawn Divitt – Curriculum Vitae
2 shared topicsphysics
61match
rockfordak.com
Doc O's Wacky World of Science Home Page
2 shared topicsscience
61match
arorarealestateservices.com
CMacLaurin.com – General relativity
2 shared topicsphysics
61match
theoryofemergence.com
TAE – Theory of Aggregated Emergence
2 shared topicsphysics
61match
beyondspacetime.net
Beyond Spacetime | A website dedicated to the philosophical foundations of quantum gravity
2 shared topicsphysics
61match
clickdeeper.com
ClickDeeper — Interactive STEM Visualizations
2 shared topicsscience
61match
cloudchambers.com
CLOUD CHAMBERS FROM SUPERSATURATED ENVIRONMENTS
2 shared topicsscience
61match
picotometer.com
Picotometer — Free Picometer Conversion Tools
2 shared topicsscience
61match
actascientiae.org
Acta Scientiae: AI Challenges Relativity’s Contradictions
2 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.