Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to benstoddard.com

Ben Stoddard - Level Design Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
grusso94.com
Giacomo Russo | Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
77match
mateuszfigura.com
Mateusz Figura | Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
matthulse.com
Matt Hulse | Level Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
benmorris.dev
Ben Morris Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
arianalawdesign.com
Ariana Law Design | Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
theodorehilhorst.com
Theodore Hilhorst – Level designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
nicolas-fabre.com
Nicolas Fabre | Level Designer Portfolio | Video Game Environments
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
arjunkurapati.com
Kurapati Arjun – Game & Level Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
inversionchamber.com
Level Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
boangelov.com
Game Design Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
kryptekdev.com
Kryptek Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
newtarch.com
My Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
alexisarenas.net
Alexis Arenas - Game & Level Designer Portfolio | Alexis Arenas
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
felixfaeh.com
Felix Faeh – Level Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
arrigo.io
Luca Arrigo Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
7samperry.com
Sam Perry - Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
themidnightsea.com
Nathan K Johnson Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
dominicnkk.com
Dominic Ng - Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.